Routerbox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| cpu = Intel J4125 (4 cores) | | cpu = Intel J4125 (4 cores) | ||
| image = routerbox.jpg | | image = routerbox.jpg | ||
| memory = | | memory = 16Gb | ||
| oss = Proxmox 8.2.2 | | oss = Proxmox 8.2.2 | ||
| disks = 2x 256Gb SSDs | | disks = 2x 256Gb SSDs | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[Pfsense router]] | * [[Pfsense router]] | ||
* [[ | * [[dns-wifi0]] | ||
* [[debian-12-reverse-proxy]] | |||
* [[debian-13-UPSMart]] | |||
The hypervisor used is Proxmox. For years I used XCP-NG, and honestly I still prefer it, but it became too buggy so I switched to Proxmox instead. The transition process was very long and intensive! | The hypervisor used is Proxmox. For years I used XCP-NG, and honestly I still prefer it, but it became too buggy so I switched to Proxmox instead. The transition process was very long and intensive! | ||
Latest revision as of 01:32, 2 January 2026
I was disappointed with the performance of my Netgate SG-1100 router so I decided to upgrade to this chinese router. It uses around the same amount of power as the Netgate, with an order of magnitude more preformance. Mine is used as a virtualization platform. There are newer models than this on the market, for example ones using the new Intel N100 CPU, but I chose this one since it uses less power. This one can be powered off POE+ from the TL-SG3428XMP. Three of the NICs are passed through to the Pfsense router VM, using PCIe passthrough. The fourth is used as a management port.
It has the following VMs:
The hypervisor used is Proxmox. For years I used XCP-NG, and honestly I still prefer it, but it became too buggy so I switched to Proxmox instead. The transition process was very long and intensive!
